0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

"Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback"

Below podcast is generated with Google's Illuminate.

Make LLMs explore beyond human rewards: unleash curiosity.

The paper addresses the challenge of aligning LLMs with human preferences using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). It introduces a novel curiosity-driven approach to enhance exploration and improve the efficiency of RLHF.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11463

Original Problem 🧐:

→ Existing RLHF methods for LLMs often struggle with sparse and delayed rewards from human feedback.

→ This can lead to inefficient exploration and suboptimal policy learning.

→ Current approaches may not fully capture the nuances of human preferences, especially in complex tasks.

-----

Solution in this Paper 😎:

→ This paper proposes Curiosity-driven Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (CRF).

→ CRF augments the standard RLHF reward with an intrinsic curiosity reward.

→ This curiosity reward encourages the LLM to explore novel and uncertain states during training.

→ The curiosity reward is calculated based on the prediction error of a learned dynamics model.

→ Specifically, it uses the disagreement between multiple dynamics models to estimate uncertainty.

→ This encourages exploration beyond simply maximizing immediate human feedback.

→ CRF aims to improve exploration efficiency and discover better policies aligned with human preferences.

-----

Key Insights from this Paper 🤔:

→ Intrinsic motivation, specifically curiosity, can be effectively integrated into RLHF for LLMs.

→ Using prediction error from ensemble dynamics models provides a robust signal for curiosity.

→ Curiosity-driven exploration can help overcome the limitations of sparse and delayed human feedback.

→ This approach can lead to more efficient and effective alignment of LLMs with human preferences.

-----

Results 🤩:

→ CRF (Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning) outperforms baseline RLHF methods on text generation tasks.

→ CRF achieves a 9.8% win rate improvement over standard RLHF in pairwise human preference evaluations.

→ CRF shows improved exploration behavior, leading to the discovery of more diverse and preferred text outputs.

Discussion about this video