"FormalAlign: Automated Alignment Evaluation for Autoformalization"

FormalALIGN: A smart way to check if math proofs are correctly translated by AI

FormalALIGN introduces automated evaluation for checking semantic alignment between informal mathematical proofs and their formal translations, reducing manual verification effort in autoformalization tasks.

-----

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10135

🤔 Original Problem

Converting informal math proofs to formal computer-verifiable formats faces a critical challenge: ensuring semantic alignment between natural and formal languages. Current methods rely heavily on manual verification or surface-level matching, making it inefficient and error-prone.

-----

🔧 Solution in this Paper

→ FormalALIGN uses a dual loss framework combining autoformalization sequence generation and representational alignment tasks

→ The model learns both to translate informal to formal math and to ensure semantic alignment through contrastive learning

→ A certainty score measures the model's confidence in predicting formal outputs, while a similarity score evaluates embedding alignment

→ The framework generates misaligned examples using strategies like constant modification, variable changes, and equality swaps for robust training

-----

💡 Key Insights

→ Combining cross-entropy and contrastive losses creates more robust alignment evaluation

→ Automated evaluation significantly reduces manual verification time from 3 hours to 2 minutes

→ The model generalizes well across different mathematical domains and complexity levels

-----

📊 Results

→ Outperforms GPT-4 with 99.21% vs 88.91% alignment score on FormL4-Basic dataset

→ Achieves 93.65% precision compared to GPT-4's 26.33% on basic mathematical statements

→ Maintains strong performance on complex problems with 66.39% accuracy on MiniF2F-Valid