ML Case-study Interview Question: LTV Prediction Driving Automated Marketing Budget Allocation and Dynamic Bidding
Browse all the ML Case-Studies here.
Case-Study question
A major on-demand platform wants to automate its online marketing process across multiple advertising channels to acquire new users more efficiently. They handle many ad campaigns for different regions. Each campaign requires selection of bids, budgets, and creative elements. This process is costly, prone to human error, and hard to scale. The leadership wants a data-driven system that can predict each new user’s likely future value, allocate budgets using those forecasts, and dynamically update bids for all campaigns. They also want to incorporate human input to ensure that the automation remains aligned with business strategy. How would you design this system end to end?
Provide a detailed solution that covers:
Predicting lifetime value of new users and dealing with early-lifecycle data constraints.
Automatically allocating budgets across campaigns in different channels.
Designing a bidding strategy that uses frequent updates and random exploration.
Implementing a human-in-the-loop workflow for continuous feedback to improve model performance.
Handling real-time campaign performance data and channel-specific nuances at scale.
Detailed Solution
A good approach breaks the system into three core modules: a lifetime value (LTV) forecaster, a budget allocator, and bidders. A pipeline collects performance data, feeds it into the LTV forecaster, and then uses that forecast to set daily budgets and bids. Each module integrates with a central orchestration layer that regularly updates all campaigns across channels.
LTV Forecaster
This module estimates how much revenue or value a user will generate over a specific time horizon. It leverages historical user data as soon as a user signs up. Early in the user’s lifecycle, no robust signals exist for measuring retention or transaction frequency, so it uses features like device type, location, or marketing channel. It refines its prediction as the user’s interactions grow.
The forecaster compares new users to historical cohorts with known lifetime behaviors. It assigns a predicted LTV based on behaviors in that cohort. It also adjusts for supply-demand dynamics if the platform has driver or service capacity constraints.
Budget Allocator
This module decides how much to spend on each campaign based on predicted returns. It takes in average LTV estimates from the forecaster and combines them with spend data. A Markov chain Monte Carlo method like Thompson Sampling is used to explore different spend levels.
Here, a and b are parameters drawn from probability distributions estimated from historical performance data. The allocator randomly samples new values for a and b each day. It fits a curve to observed spend-LTV data and explores various allocations to find higher-return spend regions.
The random exploration allows the system to find global optima. Each iteration recalculates expected returns across campaigns. It then shifts budgets toward campaigns that consistently yield higher value, but keeps modest exploration to avoid missing better solutions.
Bidders
Bidders finalize how each campaign’s allocated budget is deployed. They consist of tuners and actors. The tuners decide which levers (for example, keyword bids or maximum cost-per-install) to adjust, drawing on channel context like search keywords or referral incentives. The actors communicate those final changes via application programming interfaces (APIs) to external advertising platforms or internal channels.
A search advertising channel, for instance, might have a bidding model that updates specific keyword bids every few hours. A social channel might allow broad audience targeting with automated bidding. The bidder system abstracts those differences and centralizes the logic for the final bid push. It also injects recency weighting to handle time-sensitive shifts like seasonal spikes.
Human-in-the-Loop
Marketers observe automated decisions and provide high-level guidance. They might spot new ad creatives that drive engagement but do not show up in data yet. They can override certain campaign parameters or supply new segment definitions. The system retrains on these changes, preventing “garbage in, garbage out” issues. This keeps the automation aligned with strategic goals.
Example Code Snippet
Below is a simplified illustration of a daily pipeline in Python:
import datetime
import numpy as np
def daily_pipeline():
today = datetime.date.today()
performance_data = fetch_channel_performance(today)
ltv_forecasts = predict_ltv(performance_data)
campaign_spend_params = estimate_distribution_params(performance_data, ltv_forecasts)
allocations = budget_allocation(campaign_spend_params)
push_bids_to_channels(allocations)
if __name__ == "__main__":
daily_pipeline()
This simplistic skeleton shows a typical sequence: fetch data, run LTV predictions, estimate parameters for the budget allocator, compute allocations, then push final bids to channels.
How do you ensure these forecasts are robust when users are brand-new?
Temporal models with shorter training windows help capture fast-changing patterns. For new accounts that lack direct signals, proxy features from similar cohorts can be used. The forecaster infers expected lifetime interactions for each user, refining with more data. It uses time-based rolling windows for training to emphasize recent trends.
How do you handle randomness in budget allocation without risking huge monetary waste?
An epsilon-greedy or Thompson Sampling approach is used. It tries the best-known spend level most of the time but occasionally explores other points. The daily random draws for a and b remain bounded by confidence intervals computed from historical distributions. This keeps exploration under control while still testing alternative spend levels.
How do you address seasonality or disruptive factors?
In the budget allocator, incorporate recent performance signals with higher weight. For example, if seasonal spikes happen during holidays, the performance data from those days will have more influence on parameter updates. Include external signals like weather or large-scale events as features in the LTV model. Retrain more frequently during known high-variability periods.
How do you integrate the system with various ad channels that have unique constraints?
Each channel has a specialized bidder that translates budgets and bids into channel-specific parameters. One channel might need cost-per-click bids, another might need cost-per-install. The orchestration system remains channel-agnostic, and the bidder adapter takes the allocation rules from the allocator and implements them with channel-compliant settings through each channel’s API.
How would you scale this to manage thousands of concurrent campaigns?
Use a robust workflow orchestrator and queue manager. The pipeline parallelizes tasks for different campaigns, runs batch processes for aggregated data, and logs outcomes in real time. Containerize each bidder component so it can spin up automatically if there is a spike in campaigns. Store state in a shared data store that can be updated frequently.
How do you maintain model performance over time?
Track key metrics, including cost per acquisition and eventual retention. Compare forecasted metrics with actual performance. Retrain models frequently. Implement continuous monitoring, alert on anomalies, and enable the marketing team to adjust high-level priorities. Include offline experimentation followed by A/B testing in production to confirm improvements.
How would you incorporate novel user segments and new marketing channels?
Enable the marketing team to label new user segments or creative ideas in the orchestration system. The pipeline picks up these labels to retrain the LTV forecaster. For new channels, build a compatible bidder adapter. Evaluate unknown channel behavior by imposing higher exploration rates until enough data accumulates, and gradually refine the cost-curve parameters.
How do you identify poor-performing creatives and manage them automatically?
Include creative identifiers in the performance data. The pipeline correlates creative usage with conversions and user LTV. Low-performing creatives consistently fall below preset efficiency thresholds or show negative impact on LTV. The bidder module can pause or re-allocate budgets away from them. Marketers review these findings, confirm, and possibly remove those creatives altogether.
How do you incorporate marketplace context, such as supply constraints?
The LTV forecaster models usage frequency and spending potential for new users, factoring in driver or inventory capacity. If the platform is supply-constrained in a region, user LTV might decline during peak times. The model sees fewer completed rides for new users in those areas, reducing LTV predictions. The budget allocator then lowers spend for that region. Supply or capacity signals are additional features in the LTV model.
What if the marketing team wants to override automated bids for certain key campaigns?
They can manually override or set constraints in the system’s front-end. The orchestration process respects these adjustments, but flags them for the data team so that the ML models do not treat those changes as purely data-driven outcomes. This preserves the integrity of model training.
How do you handle data quality issues and missing data?
Implement thorough checks in each stage. If data is missing for a channel on a given day, use fallback estimates from the most recent period with valid data. Treat anomalies (sudden zero or spike) by capping outliers or applying robust scaling. These safeguards reduce noise in model training and budget allocation.
How do you expand beyond standard digital advertising to other marketing forms?
Build a universal interface for budget requests, letting offline channels (such as out-of-home advertising) or event sponsorships register their spend. Insert relevant performance signals (for example, coupon redemption codes from physical flyers) to track success. Use a portion of the system’s exploration budget for non-digital channels, then refine them as data accumulates.
How do you ensure that the system avoids repeated mistakes?
Maintain versioned model pipelines, so you can roll back if a recent deployment degrades performance. Keep a robust logging system for all decisions. If you detect repeated suboptimal allocations, run root-cause analysis and correct the data or the hyperparameters. Human overrides and post-deployment reviews catch patterns that the system alone might miss.
How would you address scale-up challenges when the number of campaigns grows and more advanced real-time bidding is needed?
Partition the data ingestion and training tasks by regions or campaign clusters. Scale the budget allocator horizontally. Offload real-time optimizations to streaming services that continuously update partial aggregates. The fundamental pipeline remains the same, but you distribute workloads for each component and store partial states for immediate updates.
How do you validate that the automation system achieves the desired business goal?
Track end-to-end metrics like cost per user, cost per ride, or revenue growth. Compare performance with historical baselines under manual bidding. Conduct holdout experiments, where a subset of campaigns stays under manual management and others use the automated pipeline. Measure improvements in cost efficiency, new-user growth, and user lifetime value.
How do you incorporate always-on experimentation?
Design the orchestration system to automatically create test splits within each campaign or user segment. Use multi-armed bandit approaches or continuous A/B frameworks. Let the pipeline vary certain bid or budget parameters among test cohorts. Collect performance data and feed it back into the main models. This ensures ongoing improvement in a live environment.