ML Interview Q Series: How can Isomap be used for Dimensionality Reduction, and what are the essential steps in its process?

📚 Browse the full ML Interview series here.

Comprehensive Explanation

Isometric Mapping (Isomap) is a powerful non-linear manifold learning technique designed to project high-dimensional data onto a lower-dimensional space while preserving the intrinsic geometric structure of the manifold from which the data arises. It achieves this by approximating geodesic distances (the shortest path along a curved manifold) between points, rather than using direct Euclidean distances in the high-dimensional space.

To understand how Isomap accomplishes dimensionality reduction, it is useful to break it down into key stages:

Constructing the Neighborhood Graph

One of the central ideas is to assume data points lying on some non-linear manifold in a high-dimensional space. A neighbor relationship is established among all points to reflect local adjacency, generally by either a k-nearest neighbors approach or an epsilon-radius approach. This neighbor graph approximates the local structure on the manifold.

Computing Geodesic Distances

Once the local neighbor graph is constructed, Isomap approximates the geodesic distance between any pair of points by computing the shortest path within this graph. Each edge in the graph corresponds to the Euclidean distance between close-by points, but the path that connects two far-apart points along the manifold is made of many such small edges that trace the manifold’s surface. This step is crucial for capturing the manifold’s intrinsic geometry.

Applying Classical Multidimensional Scaling (MDS)

After estimating pairwise distances among data points (using the geodesic approximation), Isomap uses a classical MDS-like procedure. Classical MDS aims to find a low-dimensional embedding that maintains the pairwise distances as faithfully as possible. If D is the matrix of geodesic distances and Y is the new representation of data in a lower-dimensional space, MDS tries to minimize the difference between the original distances and distances in the embedding. The goal is to find Y that preserves these distances.

A frequently used objective for MDS looks like this:

where i, j run over all pairs of data points, D_{ij} represents the geodesic distance between the i-th and j-th points in the high-dimensional space, and y_i, y_j are the low-dimensional embeddings of those points. The summation across all pairs seeks to preserve pairwise distances as closely as possible.

Interpreting the Result

The final embedding in a low-dimensional space (often 2D or 3D) reveals the manifold’s underlying structure. Clusters, curves, or surfaces in the data often become more visible. Because Isomap uses geodesic distances, it handles non-linear structures more effectively than linear methods such as PCA.

Implementation Details in Python

Below is a brief conceptual example showing how one could apply Isomap using scikit-learn. Although the inner details of the algorithm (building the neighborhood graph, computing shortest paths, etc.) are handled internally, it is helpful to see how it might be used:

from sklearn.manifold import Isomap
import numpy as np

# Suppose X is our high-dimensional dataset, shape (n_samples, n_features)
X = np.random.rand(100, 20)  # Example dataset of 100 samples, each in 20D

# Initialize Isomap
# n_neighbors controls how the neighborhood graph is constructed
# n_components is the target dimensionality
isomap = Isomap(n_neighbors=5, n_components=2)

# Fit and transform data
X_transformed = isomap.fit_transform(X)

print("Original shape:", X.shape)
print("Transformed shape:", X_transformed.shape)

This snippet demonstrates the typical usage with scikit-learn’s high-level implementation. Under the hood, it performs the steps outlined above.

Challenges and Considerations

One major practical concern with Isomap is ensuring the chosen neighborhood size is appropriate. If the neighborhood size is too small, the graph might become disconnected. If it is too large, the manifold structure may be distorted and resemble a more global Euclidean configuration. Another challenge arises when dealing with high noise or uneven sampling of the manifold. In such cases, the shortest-path geodesic approximations might not capture the true geometry accurately.

Isomap’s computational complexity can become significant, especially for large datasets, because it must construct and maintain a graph, then compute shortest paths between all pairs of points (often using algorithms like Floyd-Warshall or repeated Dijkstra’s approach). Finally, it performs an eigenvalue decomposition for the MDS step, which also can be computationally expensive on large datasets.

Possible Follow-up Questions

What are the differences between Isomap and Local Linear Embedding (LLE)?

Both methods belong to the broader class of manifold learning algorithms. Isomap tries to preserve geodesic distances, building a global metric structure using shortest paths. LLE focuses on local neighborhoods and tries to preserve local linear coefficients when transitioning from high to low dimension. In practice, LLE can sometimes better handle local relationships but might struggle with more complex global geometry. By contrast, Isomap works well when the manifold is well-sampled and geodesics are well approximated.

How can we determine a good number of neighbors for Isomap?

There is no single fixed rule. Typically, one uses domain knowledge or empirical testing. If the manifold is smoothly sampled and the data points are relatively dense, a moderate number of neighbors often suffices. Too few neighbors can fragment the graph and fail to capture longer geodesics. Too many neighbors can make the manifold appear overly “flat,” undermining the non-linear structure. In practice, cross-validation or checking the stress (the residual error in distance preservation) as a function of neighborhood size can help.

What happens if the manifold is not well-sampled or is extremely high-dimensional?

If the data points do not densely sample the manifold, the shortest path approximations can become unreliable. Holes or sparse regions might mislead the algorithm into large jumps. In extremely high-dimensional spaces, the distance metrics themselves can become distorted (the curse of dimensionality). In these scenarios, you often need more data, specialized sampling strategies, or additional modifications like outlier handling or methods that handle missing manifold regions more gracefully.

Why does Isomap rely on an MDS step at the end?

Isomap’s core distance concept is the geodesic distance. Once these distances are computed, the question is how to place points in a low-dimensional space that faithfully preserves those distances. Classical MDS naturally solves this problem by minimizing the difference between distances in high-dimensional space (or manifold geodesics) and distances in the lower-dimensional representation. The synergy between geodesic distance computation (from the manifold) and MDS is what makes Isomap a powerful approach for non-linear dimensionality reduction.

How does Isomap compare with modern methods like t-SNE or UMAP?

t-SNE and UMAP focus more on preserving local neighborhoods or probability distributions rather than directly preserving pairwise geodesic distances. These more recent methods are often favored for visualization in lower dimensions (like 2D), because they can capture complex cluster structures in a way that appears more separated. However, Isomap’s more geometric approach can be advantageous if you want a global metric-preserving embedding and a deeper sense of the manifold’s overall geometry.

Are there scenarios where Isomap may fail or produce poor results?

A crucial requirement is that the dataset must be sampled sufficiently densely on a single connected manifold. If there are multiple disconnected manifolds or the data is extremely noisy, the neighbor graph might not capture the geometry accurately. Furthermore, if the dataset is large, running Isomap can become computationally intensive. Finally, if the intrinsic manifold dimension is very high compared to the sample size, the estimated geodesic distances may be unreliable.

How can one interpret the embedding results in real-world applications?

After applying Isomap and getting a low-dimensional projection, points that lie close together in the embedding are likely to be neighbors on the underlying manifold. One can use visualization techniques to see clusters or trajectories, which is especially helpful in applications like image manifolds, speech, or sensor data. For instance, analyzing handwritten digit images with Isomap can reveal transitions between different digit shapes while preserving a more global notion of distance compared to purely local methods.