ML Interview Q Series: How would you describe how Information Gain compares and relates to the Information Gain Ratio?

📚 Browse the full ML Interview series here.

Comprehensive Explanation

Information Gain measures the reduction in entropy obtained by splitting a dataset using a particular feature. It is often used in decision tree learning to identify which feature is most beneficial to split on at each node. One challenge is that Information Gain alone can exhibit a bias toward features with numerous unique values. The Information Gain Ratio addresses this by normalizing Information Gain with the intrinsic information of the split, mitigating the bias.

Information Gain

This quantity captures how much uncertainty in the target variable is reduced by splitting on a certain feature.

Here, S is the dataset before splitting, A is the feature on which we split, Values(A) are all possible values of A, S_v is the subset of S for which feature A has value v, and H( ) is the entropy function. The fraction |S_v| / |S| gives the proportion of samples in that subset, and H(S_v) is its entropy.

Information Gain Ratio

Because Information Gain tends to favor splits with many distinct values, the Information Gain Ratio divides the Information Gain by the split's intrinsic information, which quantifies how broadly and evenly the feature splits the data.

In the denominator, the term -sum (|S_v| / |S| * log2(|S_v| / |S|)) represents the intrinsic information of the feature A, essentially capturing how uniformly the dataset is split. By dividing the Information Gain by this measure, the Gain Ratio controls for the fact that some features might artificially appear more informative simply because they have many distinct values.

Practical Observations

One should note that the Gain Ratio can sometimes overcompensate and prefer features that split data into more balanced subsets. Decision tree algorithms like C4.5 use Gain Ratio to choose the best features, but they often include heuristics, such as using pure Information Gain to break ties or skipping splits that produce an extremely low intrinsic information.

Features that split the data in a highly imbalanced manner might yield a high Information Gain but a low Gain Ratio, indicating that such a split might be partially driven by the large difference in subset sizes. On the other hand, a feature that splits the data into more balanced subsets can have a more moderate Information Gain but could still have a strong Gain Ratio.

Follow-up Questions

Why is Entropy used as the measure of impurity when computing Information Gain?

Entropy measures the uncertainty or disorder in a system. In the context of classification, the entropy indicates how mixed or pure the labels are in a dataset. A set that has all samples from the same class has zero entropy, signifying perfect homogeneity. A set that is evenly split between classes has higher entropy, indicating more uncertainty. By splitting a dataset on a certain feature, we hope to reduce this entropy, which translates into more confident class predictions.

Could we use Gini Impurity instead of Entropy for these measures?

It is common to see Gini Impurity used in CART (Classification and Regression Trees). Gini Impurity is mathematically simpler to compute than entropy, and in practice both metrics often yield comparable decision trees. Whether you use entropy or Gini Impurity, the idea of measuring how much impurity is removed by a split remains the same. If you use Gini Impurity, you would replace the entropy calculations accordingly to obtain something analogous to Gini Gain. The concept of normalizing by an intrinsic measure (similar to the denominator in the Gain Ratio) can still be applied if you observe a bias toward features with many unique values.

How do we handle continuous features when computing Information Gain or Gain Ratio?

When dealing with continuous features, you typically define a threshold to split the dataset into two subsets: one where the feature is less than or equal to the threshold, and another where the feature is greater than the threshold. You would then calculate the Information Gain or Gain Ratio for each potential threshold. Finding the best threshold usually involves trying multiple possible values (for instance, midpoints between sorted values of the feature in the dataset) and selecting the threshold that maximizes the chosen metric.

Is it possible for a feature to have a high Information Gain but low Gain Ratio?

This can happen if the feature splits the data into subsets that differ in size by a substantial margin. The raw difference in entropy could be large, giving a high Information Gain, but if the intrinsic information of the feature is also large, then the ratio could be reduced. This indicates that while the feature may appear highly informative in an absolute sense, its “spread” of values is also contributing heavily to that apparent informativeness, which the Gain Ratio is penalizing.

Is it ever advisable to use Information Gain over Gain Ratio?

It depends on the problem and the data. Information Gain is simpler and well-understood but can favor features with many distinct values. If you have reason to believe that your dataset has features with many unique values that might lead to overfitting, using the Gain Ratio could help offset that bias. Some practitioners might still use Information Gain if they have domain-specific knowledge of which features truly matter, or if they incorporate regularization or other techniques to combat overfitting. In many modern algorithms, you may also see alternative criteria like Gini Impurity or even measures of statistical significance being used.

How do modern tree-based methods in libraries like XGBoost or LightGBM handle splitting criteria?

Algorithms like XGBoost and LightGBM typically use a gradient-based approach to find splits. They measure how each split impacts the model’s objective function (often a differentiable loss). Instead of using classic entropy or Gini criteria, these implementations rely on gradient and second-order gradient statistics to evaluate potential splits. This approach can be more efficient and is often more suitable for large datasets. Nevertheless, the fundamental concept of “choosing the split that best reduces uncertainty or error” still applies, even if the metric changes from entropy to gradient-based evaluations.

How does one implement Information Gain-based splitting in Python?

A small illustrative example in Python is shown below. This example demonstrates how to compute entropy and then measure Information Gain for splitting on a particular feature. While it may not be optimized for production-level use, it shows the core logic behind calculating entropy-based metrics.

import numpy as np
from math import log2

def entropy(labels):
    unique_labels, counts = np.unique(labels, return_counts=True)
    probabilities = counts / len(labels)
    return -sum(p * log2(p) for p in probabilities)

def information_gain(data, labels, feature_index):
    # Split data based on the feature_index
    unique_values = np.unique(data[:, feature_index])
    total_entropy = entropy(labels)
    weighted_entropy_sum = 0.0

    for value in unique_values:
        subset_indices = (data[:, feature_index] == value)
        subset_labels = labels[subset_indices]
        weighted_entropy_sum += (len(subset_labels) / len(labels)) * entropy(subset_labels)

    return total_entropy - weighted_entropy_sum

# Example usage
data = np.array([[1, 'A'], [2, 'B'], [1, 'B'], [2, 'A']])  # 2 features
labels = np.array([0, 1, 1, 0])

gain = information_gain(data, labels, feature_index=0)
print("Information Gain for feature_index=0:", gain)

This example shows basic entropy and Information Gain. One can adapt it to compute the Gain Ratio by additionally calculating the intrinsic information in the denominator.

All these concepts underscore the idea that while Information Gain is a straightforward measure of a feature’s utility in reducing label uncertainty, the Gain Ratio is specifically designed to address the bias that arises if a feature has many discrete values.