ML Interview Q Series: How would you investigate a 10% drop in fill rate on a social media ad platform?
📚 Browse the full ML Interview series here.
Comprehensive Explanation
One crucial metric in online advertising is the ratio of actual ad impressions to the total potential opportunities for displaying an ad. This ratio is commonly referred to as fill rate. The formula can be represented as:
The numerator, Number of Impressions, is the count of ads that were actually delivered and viewed by users, while the denominator, Potential Opportunities, is the total set of ad slots that could have been filled. A 10% decline in fill rate indicates that you are showing fewer ads per available opportunity compared to a previous baseline. This discrepancy could be caused by several factors:
Supply and Demand Fluctuations
A decline in advertiser demand might mean there are fewer relevant ads available to fill each opportunity. This could happen if certain large advertisers paused or scaled back their campaigns or if seasonality caused a typical dip in spending. Simultaneously, supply might increase if user activity goes up significantly without a corresponding rise in ad campaigns.
Changes in User Behavior
User traffic might have changed in unexpected ways. If users are spending less time on the platform, bouncing more quickly, or skipping over ad slots, that can lower the total impressions served. Even if there are enough ads to fill the slots, fewer sessions or session durations can decrease actual impressions.
Auction Dynamics and Bidding Issues
If the platform uses real-time bidding, something could have changed in the auction algorithm, or there might be a drop in bid density (fewer bids per ad request). A reduction in average bid price or more stringent targeting constraints can lead to an increased number of unfilled ad slots.
Frequency Capping or Pacing
Adjustments in frequency capping (i.e., limiting the number of ads a user sees in a given timeframe) or budget pacing might result in fewer ad impressions being served. For instance, if the system becomes more conservative, trying to ensure even ad distribution throughout the day, it may intentionally let some slots go unfilled.
Targeting or Relevance Shifts
Modifications in the user-ad matching model can cause a mismatch in targeted ads. If a new targeting rule disqualifies many ads for a specific user segment, the platform might have fewer eligible ads to fill inventory, resulting in unfilled impressions.
Creative Approval Bottlenecks
Sometimes ad creatives go through a policy review. If a large portion of ad creatives got stuck in review or got disapproved, the available ad volume can drop. This is particularly common if there was a policy update or an unexpected surge in new ad creatives.
Data or Logging Discrepancies
A 10% dip might reflect a reporting issue rather than a real decrease. It is possible there was an error in the data pipeline, which caused impressions to be undercounted or opportunities to be overcounted. Investigating logging systems and ensuring that the fill rate calculation has not changed is crucial.
Changes in Ad Prioritization
Platforms often have multiple ad products with distinct priorities. If higher priority ads (or new ad units) consumed inventory or if the system reallocated some ad opportunities to other internal promotions, that could reduce standard ad fill rate.
Testing or Release of New Features
Any modifications in the ad delivery system, UI experiments, or new feature rollouts might lead to unexpected dips. Sometimes AB tests alter how often certain slots are shown ads or how quickly the ad request is triggered during page load.
Investigative Steps
Segment the Decline: Break down the fill rate by geography, device type, user segment, or ad placement. Determine if the dip is localized or global.
Check Advertiser Demand and Budgets: Examine if big advertisers have paused or cut spend. Look at seasonal patterns or new competitor dynamics.
Review Auction Logs: Evaluate whether average bids, fill from DSPs (Demand-Side Platforms), or overall auctions per request decreased.
Analyze User Behavior Metrics: Look for changes in session lengths, page view counts per user, or click-through rates that might be impacting impression counts.
Inspect System Changes: Identify recent updates to code, model changes, or newly rolled out features that could indirectly affect fill rate.
Validate Data Pipelines: Ensure that the counting mechanism for both impressions and opportunities is consistent. Check for logging issues or partial data ingestion.
Sample Python Snippet for Analyzing Data
import pandas as pd
# Assume we have logs or aggregated data in a DataFrame
# The DataFrame has columns: ['date', 'impressions', 'opportunities', 'region']
def analyze_fill_rate_drop(data):
# Compute daily fill rates
data['fill_rate'] = data['impressions'] / data['opportunities']
# Compare fill rate day over day
data['fill_rate_diff'] = data['fill_rate'].pct_change() * 100
# Identify days where fill rate dipped significantly
significant_dips = data[data['fill_rate_diff'] <= -10]
return significant_dips
# Example usage
# df = pd.read_csv('ad_data.csv')
# dips = analyze_fill_rate_drop(df)
# print(dips)
This example code highlights a straightforward approach to detect dates or segments where a fill rate drop of 10% or more has occurred.
Potential Follow-up Questions
How would you differentiate a real fill rate drop from a data logging issue?
One would compare internal logs with external metrics or source-of-truth databases. If the discrepancy is not reflected in advertiser billing or third-party tracking, then the drop might be an artifact of logging or pipeline errors. Additionally, you can segment the data by smaller time intervals or cross-check with a control group. If the issue is consistent across multiple, independent sources, it is more likely to be real.
Could a shift in user demographics cause a fill rate drop?
Yes, if the platform suddenly attracts or loses a demographic that is less interesting to current advertisers, there might be fewer ads targeting that audience. For instance, if younger users who are less monetizable become a larger share of total traffic, the platform might not have enough ads aimed at them. This mismatch can directly lower fill rate.
If demand has not changed, how else can system updates result in fewer impressions?
Several updates can inadvertently limit impressions. For instance, a bug in the ad server logic might cause fewer ad requests to be triggered, or a user interface change might hide certain ad placements or delay ad call execution. Even a subtle timing change in the ad request code (such as waiting for page load events) could reduce total impressions served during short sessions.
What immediate data would you request from your team to diagnose the fill rate dip?
You might request:
A breakdown of daily impression volume vs. daily opportunities.
Auction logs with bid densities and win/loss data.
Historical performance data to see if the dip is seasonal or cyclical.
User engagement metrics like session duration, pages viewed, and churn rates.
Deployment logs or change logs for the ad serving pipeline.
How would you mitigate a 10% dip if you confirm it is due to decreased demand?
Potential strategies include:
Reaching out to advertisers to raise awareness about ad inventory opportunities and offering targeted promotions.
Adjusting floor prices or relaxing targeting constraints to attract more bids.
Introducing better creative guidelines to reduce disapproval rates and expand the pool of active ads.
Collaborating with sales and marketing teams to drive more campaigns.
All of the above steps would be performed while closely monitoring fill rates, revenue, and user experience impacts to ensure that recovery efforts do not introduce new issues.
Below are additional follow-up questions
How can platform-specific or placement-specific factors contribute to a fill rate drop?
Platform-specific or placement-specific factors often play a big role in ad fill rates. For instance, mobile placements might differ from desktop in terms of user behavior, screen real estate, ad load latency, or the types of advertisers targeting those environments. A placement at the top of a news feed might have a higher fill rate than a placement at the bottom simply because it is more visible and more advertisers specifically bid on it. Investigating these differences requires segmenting fill rate by platform (Android vs. iOS vs. desktop) or by placement (header ad vs. footer ad, feed ad vs. story ad) to see whether any particular segment drives the overall drop.
Pitfalls and Edge Cases:
Users might behave differently on mobile apps, closing an ad-laden feed more quickly, resulting in fewer actual impressions.
A newly introduced ad placement could inadvertently compete with an existing, high-performing ad slot, cannibalizing impressions there and lowering overall fill rate.
Some ad formats (e.g., video vs. display) have different demand and supply characteristics. If you introduce more video placements but there’s insufficient video creative demand, the overall fill rate might dip.
How do you handle weighted fill rate calculations when different segments have varying significance?
When each user segment or placement does not carry equal weight (e.g., certain geographies generate higher revenue or certain ad placements produce more impressions), a “simple average” fill rate may give an incomplete picture. You might adopt a weighted fill rate approach, where segments are scaled by their traffic volume or revenue contribution.
In plain text: Weighted fill rate is the sum of impressions over the sum of opportunities across all segments i in the set of segments from 1 to N.
Here, Impressions_i is the total number of ads served to segment i, and Opportunities_i is the total number of ad slots available in segment i. Essentially, this formula accounts for the proportion of total volume each segment represents. By calculating both unweighted and weighted fill rates, you can see if a dip is caused by a large drop in one highly trafficked segment or smaller dips across multiple smaller segments.
Pitfalls and Edge Cases:
Overemphasizing a high-volume, low-value segment might mask fill rate issues within a highly valuable segment.
Using the wrong weighting metric (like revenue vs. user impressions) could mislead the investigation. It is important to choose a weighting factor consistent with business objectives.
What if external economic factors or market events caused a sudden drop in advertiser demand?
External factors can lead to abrupt changes in advertiser demand. Examples might include macroeconomic downturns, sudden regulatory changes affecting ad spend (like privacy regulations), or competitor platforms capturing advertiser budgets. During such periods, you might see a simultaneous drop in both cost-per-click bids and the total volume of campaigns.
Pitfalls and Edge Cases:
The platform might interpret a global or regional recession-related dip in ad spend as an internal problem, potentially leading to misguided engineering or product decisions.
If a single major advertiser cuts budget due to unforeseen circumstances (e.g., negative PR or supply chain disruption), it could drastically impact overall fill rate, especially if they held a dominant share of your inventory.
Could fill rate dips result from fraudulent or invalid traffic detection enhancements?
Yes. If you recently improved detection algorithms for invalid or bot traffic, you might be discarding suspicious ad requests or marking them as ineligible to serve. This would reduce the total “valid” impressions while keeping the raw potential opportunities count high, thereby artificially lowering fill rate from a measurement standpoint.
Pitfalls and Edge Cases:
Overzealous detection filters might label legitimate traffic as invalid (false positives), causing an unintended reduction in impressions.
Advertisers might actually prefer the cleaner traffic, so over time, you might see better monetization or better downstream metrics despite the initial apparent drop in fill rate.
How do you isolate fill rate issues that appear only at specific times of day or days of the week?
Analyzing fill rate on an hourly or daily basis can unearth hidden patterns, such as weekdays vs. weekends or specific peak hours vs. off-peak hours. For instance, fill rate might drop significantly at night if advertisers predominantly schedule their budgets for daytime. Conversely, if your system exhibits peak traffic on weekends but advertisers do not align their budgets to those peaks, fill rates can drop during that period.
Pitfalls and Edge Cases:
Complex seasonalities or cultural holidays can compound the hourly or daily variations. For instance, an upcoming holiday weekend might have lower user engagement or different usage patterns.
Bidding systems might apply daily budget caps that get reached faster in certain time zones, leaving subsequent hours under-filled.
What if the platform introduced or changed a minimum price floor for ads?
If you raise price floors for display or video ads, some advertisers might opt out or reallocate budgets to cheaper placements. This can cause a sudden drop in the number of filled impressions while the opportunities remain the same, lowering fill rate. Alternatively, if you remove or decrease floors, you might allow more low-quality ads, which could temporarily inflate fill rate (but possibly lower overall revenue).
Pitfalls and Edge Cases:
Too high a floor can exclude smaller advertisers, concentrating spend among a few large buyers. If those large buyers suddenly reduce spend, fill rate can plummet.
Rapid changes to price floors without adequate testing can cause wide fluctuations in both fill rate and revenue, making it hard to pinpoint the optimal strategy.
Could an increase in internal promotions or house ads lead to a perceived fill rate drop?
Yes, if the system prioritizes house ads (ads promoting your own platform features or apps) at zero cost and you track only paid impressions in your “impressions” count, the number of paid ads served might go down. The potential ad slots are still recorded as available, but a significant share of them is taken over by non-monetized internal promotions.
Pitfalls and Edge Cases:
House ads might be used for strategic reasons, such as pushing new products or encouraging user growth, so the drop in fill rate is not necessarily undesirable but needs careful interpretation.
If too many house ads run, advertisers might see lower performance on their campaigns, prompting them to reduce budgets in the future.
How can advanced anomaly detection or predictive models help in preventing fill rate drops?
By applying machine learning or statistical models to historical fill rate data, you can build forecasting models to predict expected fill rates under normal conditions. Any significant deviation from the forecast signals an anomaly that triggers an immediate investigation. Techniques range from simple ARIMA time-series models to more complex deep learning architectures.
Pitfalls and Edge Cases:
Model drift can occur if user behavior changes drastically, causing the forecasting model to become outdated.
Overreliance on automated anomaly detection can lead to alert fatigue if the system flags normal, short-term fluctuations as major anomalies. Regular tuning of thresholds is essential.
Even with predictive alerts, you need a well-defined response protocol: who is responsible for investigating the anomaly, and what data sources are used to diagnose it?