ML Interview Q Series: How would you evaluate Instagram's private story feature performance, considering its limited audience visibility?

📚 Browse the full ML Interview series here.

Comprehensive Explanation

Measuring the success of Instagram’s private (close friends) stories involves defining, tracking, and interpreting a variety of user-centric and engagement-related metrics. When only certain friends can see a story, success can be gauged by how effectively it fosters meaningful interaction and user satisfaction within that select audience. Below are some dimensions and metrics to consider:

Engagement Rate Within the Chosen Audience

A straightforward yet crucial indicator is the proportion of selected friends who engage with the story in some way (viewing it, responding with reactions, or sending direct messages).

In this expression, “Number of close friends who viewed the story” is the count of individuals out of the chosen group who actually opened or saw the story. “Number of close friends included in the audience” is the total count of friends the user selected for private viewing.

Higher values of this rate typically suggest stronger engagement. One can further track reaction counts, reply frequencies, or average watch duration to capture how compelling or interesting the story might be.

User Satisfaction and Retention

Beyond simple viewing metrics, a critical focus is understanding whether the private story feature is leading to higher user satisfaction. Are users who share private stories returning to the platform more frequently? Are they more likely to continue using the feature?

One might track:

• Frequency of private story posting per user over time.

• Growth or decline of the average number of close friends invited to private stories.

• Changes in user churn rate (i.e., if users frequently leveraging private stories remain active longer than those who do not).

Content Quality Signals

Story length, story type (images, videos, text-only), and the presence of interactive elements (like polls or stickers) can significantly affect engagement. One can:

• Segment view rates by story type.

• Compare performance (in terms of average watch time, number of swipes to skip, or number of replies) across diverse content.

Direct Interactions Among Close Friends

Private stories encourage more intimate or personal conversations. Tracking the volume of direct messages triggered by viewing a private story can give insights into how private stories foster deeper connection:

• Average replies or reactions per private story.

• Likelihood that a private story sparks a conversation (and length of that conversation).

Qualitative Feedback and Surveys

While quantitative metrics are essential, user surveys or feedback forms are helpful for capturing subjective aspects like perceived privacy, sense of closeness, and comfort level with sharing. Key insights include:

• User sentiment about the feature’s privacy control.

• Feedback on ease of selecting the intended close friends audience.

• Perceived impact on personal connections and relationships.

Potential Biases and Confounders

Factors such as time zones, content popularity, personal relationships, and the overall size of the user’s close friends list can skew engagement metrics. For instance:

• A user might have a small circle of close friends who are extremely active on Instagram, boosting the view rate.

• Conversely, a larger friend circle might dilute the engagement if many selected friends do not check Instagram often.

Example Python Code to Calculate Basic Metrics

The following code snippet demonstrates how to calculate a simple view rate from a dataset where each row represents an event of a user posting a private story and the list of invited friends, along with which friends viewed that story.

import pandas as pd

# Suppose we have a DataFrame df with columns:
# 'story_id', 'user_id', 'close_friends_count', 'views_from_close_friends'
# close_friends_count = total number of friends invited to the story
# views_from_close_friends = how many of those invited friends viewed the story

data = {
    'story_id': [101, 102, 103, 104],
    'user_id': [1, 1, 2, 3],
    'close_friends_count': [5, 5, 10, 2],
    'views_from_close_friends': [4, 5, 7, 2]
}
df = pd.DataFrame(data)

# Calculate the view rate for each story
df['view_rate'] = df['views_from_close_friends'] / df['close_friends_count']

# Print results
print(df)

# Aggregate metrics across all stories (e.g., mean view rate)
mean_view_rate = df['view_rate'].mean()
print(f"Average view rate: {mean_view_rate:.2f}")

In a real production scenario, you would likely have multiple logs capturing precise viewing events, timestamps, content engagement details, or user feedback data. Aggregating these logs carefully and cleaning them for analysis would be essential to ensure reliable results.

How would you handle privacy concerns when collecting these metrics?

Respecting user privacy is paramount:

• Data anonymization can be used to ensure no personal details are tied to individual metrics. Instead of storing friend IDs directly, one might rely on hashed or aggregated data.

• Employ differential privacy techniques if needed to ensure no single user’s data is individually identifiable.

• Obtain user consent or rely on platform-level terms of service that clearly state how aggregated engagement data is used.

What confounding factors might influence these metrics?

Multiple elements can introduce bias or noise into measurements:

• Inactive or infrequent users: If some close friends rarely open Instagram, the view rate may be artificially low.

• Content specifics: The type and length of the story content can significantly affect engagement (e.g., short, humorous clips vs. long, serious videos).

• Time of posting: Posting time might affect view rates, especially with friends spanning various time zones.

• Platform-level changes: Changes to the app’s notification system or UI redesigns can alter user behaviors, making it harder to interpret a short-term dip or spike in metrics.

How do you ensure the feature remains private while gathering data?

When collecting engagement data, implement secure pipelines and robust access control. Engineers or data scientists typically only see aggregated counts or hashed IDs, never raw friend lists with identifiable information. Logging infrastructure should be designed so that individual user-level data cannot be inspected casually and is tightly governed by privacy policies.

How might you compare the engagement on private stories to public stories?

One could compute comparable metrics (view rates, reaction counts, reply counts) for both private and public stories, then:

• Normalize these metrics per friend count or follower count to control for the difference in audience scale.

• Examine whether private stories exhibit a proportionally higher engagement rate per friend, indicating more intimate interactions.

• Investigate whether private stories generate deeper 1:1 or small-group conversations in contrast to more superficial public story interactions.

How do these metrics help guide product improvements?

Observing how users interact with private stories can inform:

• UI design changes that make selecting close friends simpler or more intuitive.

• Recommendations on how to create more appealing private stories (e.g., stickers, quick replies, polls).

• Potential new features like group-based story creation or suggested friend groupings.

How would you set up an A/B test for new features on private stories?

An A/B test might involve adding a novel privacy-related or engagement-related feature (such as a “private poll” sticker) to a randomly selected subset of users. Steps could include:

1. Splitting a user population into control and treatment groups.

2. Introducing the new feature only to the treatment group.

3. Comparing metrics like average story view rate, direct message volume, or story creation frequency.

4. Controlling for confounders by ensuring both groups have similar usage patterns before the experiment begins.

What if many invited friends never see the story in time?

Instagram’s algorithm or user behavior might mean stories expire before some friends check them. One might measure:

• Late View Rate: how often stories are viewed only at the tail end of the 24-hour availability.

• Reminder Efficacy: if any notification or highlight is used to inform close friends of the new private story.

• Whether or not re-engagement notifications improve those view rates or cause user annoyance.

How would you incorporate user satisfaction data with these metrics?

In addition to quantitative data, product teams can gather user sentiment via surveys or support tickets:

• Combine aggregated engagement metrics with Net Promoter Score (NPS) or direct user feedback.

• Look for correlations between high satisfaction and certain usage behaviors. For instance, do highly satisfied users often use private stories more frequently?

Such insights can help refine the product and prioritize new features, ensuring that private story sharing remains both safe and rewarding for users.

Below are additional follow-up questions

How do you measure engagement if many close friends live in different time zones and may miss the private story before it expires?

A challenge emerges when stories vanish after 24 hours, especially if friends are scattered across vastly different time zones. One method is to capture the percentage of invited viewers who watched the story within that 24-hour window. However, merely looking at raw views can be misleading if many recipients never log in during that window. Potential mitigations:

• Adjusted View Window: Track time-to-first-view from the moment each user opens the app, rather than from the story's posting time. This way, you can see if viewers engage when they are next active.

• Time-Zone Grouping: Group viewers by regions or time zones, then compare view rates within each group. This helps isolate whether low engagement in certain time zones reflects an actual lack of interest or simply unfortunate posting times.

• Controlled Notifications: If the platform sends notifications to close friends, measure how quickly recipients respond after receiving them. Delayed responses might suggest that either the time zone mismatch is problematic or that notifications aren’t effective.

Pitfalls include overestimating engagement if one group is very active and underestimating for groups that rarely log in. Additionally, user behaviors can shift seasonally or during holidays, adding complexity to time-based metrics.

How can you assess the “stickiness” or repeated usage of the private story feature among creators and viewers over time?

Here, the core question is whether users consistently return to create or view private stories. Potential metrics:

• Creator Stickiness: Track the fraction of private story creators who post private stories again in subsequent weeks. A high retention rate indicates the feature remains valuable to them.

• Viewer Consistency: For those who frequently view private stories, measure how many private stories they keep watching week over week.

• Recurring Engagement: Look at the number of repeated private story interactions among the same cluster of friends. If the same group repeatedly engages, that might indicate high relationship value within that private setting.

Edge cases arise when users post private stories sporadically or only for big life events. Also, newly added features can temporarily boost usage, so it’s vital to measure beyond short-term spikes.

What if private stories start overshadowing public stories? How would you track potential cannibalization of overall engagement?

In some cases, private stories may become more appealing than public ones, causing a shift in user behavior. You can measure:

• Ratio of Private to Public Story Posts: The change in how many total stories are private vs. public for each user over time.

• Public Story Engagement Drop: If public story view rates decrease in parallel with an increase in private story usage, that might signal cannibalization. You’d compare average views and interactions for public stories before and after the surge in private stories.

• Net Engagement: Assess whether overall time on the platform and user satisfaction rise or fall. Even if some public engagement migrates to private stories, total platform engagement might grow if users feel more comfortable sharing privately.

A pitfall is misattributing normal user fluctuations or seasonal changes to private story usage. Another complexity is that many users post both public and private stories for different audiences and contexts, making causal interpretation tricky.

How do you evaluate the effect of stories’ ephemeral nature on users’ sense of privacy or willingness to share more personal content?

Ephemerality can foster more candid sharing. To measure this:

• Survey Data: Ask creators if they feel safer sharing personal or sensitive content via ephemeral private stories. Correlate their subjective ratings with actual usage behaviors.

• Depth of Content: Look at signals like average video length or personal disclosures (though only aggregated or anonymized sentiment analysis, never individual content) to see if ephemeral private stories encourage more intimate posts.

• Comparison to Non-Ephemeral Features: If Instagram has permanent posting avenues (e.g., feed posts, highlights), compare what types of content are posted there vs. private ephemeral stories.

A potential pitfall is that some users might still be concerned about screenshots or unintended shares. Ephemerality does not guarantee absolute privacy, so higher willingness to share personal content may be offset by fear of capturing or forwarding.

How do you assess whether different UI designs or feature placements increase or decrease usage of close friends stories?

Small changes in how the feature is presented can drive usage shifts. Approaches include:

• A/B Testing: Randomly assign different UI layouts to subsets of users and measure differences in story creation rates, story views, or user satisfaction.

• Click-Through Path Analysis: Evaluate how easily users can discover or select their close friends list. A more streamlined flow can raise usage, while a cluttered interface might discourage it.

• Completion Rate: Track how often users abandon the process of creating a private story midway. This could signal UI friction or confusion about the feature’s steps.

Be mindful that early adopters might behave differently from mainstream users, and global rollouts might have distinct cultural or regional usage patterns. Some design changes that benefit one user segment could hinder another.

Could users excluded from private stories become frustrated? How would you measure that impact?

The concern is that people might feel left out or suffer from “fear of missing out” (FOMO). Potential measurements:

• Indirect Signals: Sudden drops in general engagement by users who are excluded from multiple private stories. Alternatively, if they still open Instagram but post less, it might indicate dissatisfaction.

• Social Network Effects: Look for changes in friend relationships or follow/unfollow patterns. Feelings of exclusion might cause users to disengage or reconfigure their friend circles.

• User Feedback: Surveys or direct feedback channels where users can indicate if they feel left out when not included in private stories.

Subtlety arises if users do not publicly admit dissatisfaction or simply reduce their usage gradually. Interpreting a correlation between private story usage and some users’ exit from the platform requires careful statistical analysis, including controlling for a user’s general usage trends.

How do you prevent private stories from becoming spammy and measure if users become annoyed or fatigued?

High-frequency posting of private stories can cause recipients to feel overwhelmed. Metrics include:

• Mute or Hide Rate: The frequency with which recipients mute a close friend’s stories. An uptick in this action can signal annoyance or fatigue.

• Drop in Response: If the conversation or reaction rate for a given user’s stories steadily declines while the posting frequency soars, that might indicate oversaturation.

• Time Between Viewing and Exit: Users might watch a few stories and then exit the app prematurely if they feel spammed.

Pitfalls occur when interpreting muted stories, as some users might mute temporarily for reasons unrelated to spam. Another subtlety is that certain content types (e.g., event coverage) might naturally invite more frequent posting without necessarily annoying viewers.

How do you ensure your sample size is sufficiently large to yield statistically reliable insights for each segment of private story usage?

Given that private stories can be used differently by diverse user segments (e.g., influencers vs. casual users), you need robust sampling:

• Stratified Sampling: Segment users by factors like follower count, posting frequency, or geographic region. Then ensure each segment has enough data points for meaningful analysis.

• Power Analysis: Before running an experiment (e.g., A/B tests), perform a power analysis to confirm that the sample can detect the expected effect size in each subgroup.

• Continuous Monitoring: Reevaluate as user behavior evolves. A sample that was representative six months ago might no longer reflect the current population if user demographics have shifted.

If the sample is too small in some segments, results may be too noisy or may mask meaningful differences in how the feature performs among different user categories.

How would you handle changes in the close friends list over time and measure if it affects engagement or user satisfaction?

Users might frequently add or remove friends from their private story list:

• List Stability: Measure how often users alter their close friends list. Frequent adjustments could indicate that users are fine-tuning privacy or that the selection process is confusing.

• Engagement Correlation: Track whether changes in the close friends list correlate with shifts in story view rates or replies. For example, if a user removes less-engaged friends, their new private stories may see a higher percentage of views.

• Survey Insight: Ask why users are adjusting the list. Are they responding to feedback from viewers, privacy concerns, or new real-world relationships?

Pitfalls include misunderstanding the reason behind list changes—some might reflect major life events (like breakups or new friendships) rather than dissatisfaction with the feature itself.

How do you account for malicious or unintended usage when measuring success?

Even private stories can be abused—spam content, harassment, or misinformation may circulate in these more insular circles. To track this:

• Reports or Blocks: Monitor if recipients report a private story or block the creator, which is a strong negative signal.

• Abnormal Posting Patterns: Sudden spikes in repetitive or harmful content shared privately may indicate misuse.

• User Exits: If recipients consistently leave Instagram or sever connections after certain private stories, it may suggest harmful behavior.

The challenge is that misuse is more hidden in private spaces, making detection harder. Also, not all negative interactions get reported. Balancing user privacy with platform moderation is crucial; you must ensure your metric collection methods do not violate user trust or privacy norms.