ML Interview Q Series: How would you describe your understanding of dimensionality reduction?
📚 Browse the full ML Interview series here.
Comprehensive Explanation
Dimensionality reduction refers to the process of mapping high-dimensional data into a lower-dimensional space while aiming to preserve as much meaningful structure or information as possible. In many practical Machine Learning tasks, datasets can have hundreds or even thousands of features, making it computationally expensive to train models and potentially causing issues like overfitting. By reducing the number of features in a meaningful way, we often achieve faster training times, lower storage requirements, and sometimes better model generalization.
Key Objectives and Intuition
One core objective behind dimensionality reduction is to remove redundant or highly correlated features so the remaining transformations or features capture the majority of the data’s variability. Another objective is to reduce noise in the data, so the essential patterns stand out clearly. This is particularly relevant when dealing with high-dimensional feature vectors where many features might be irrelevant or only contribute marginally to the predictive power of the model.
Common Approaches
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a widely used method that projects the data onto new axes (principal components) which correspond to directions of maximum variance in the dataset. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) focuses on finding a lower-dimensional representation that best separates different classes. Non-linear methods, such as t-SNE or UMAP, use more sophisticated transformations to capture manifold structures in data.
Core Mathematical Formulation for PCA
One way to view PCA is via the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) of a data matrix. Suppose we have a centered data matrix X with shape n x d, where n is the number of samples and d is the number of features:
Here:
X is the original data matrix.
U is an n x d orthonormal matrix whose columns are called the left singular vectors.
Σ is a d x d diagonal matrix with non-negative real numbers on the diagonal, representing the singular values (sorted in descending order).
V is a d x d orthonormal matrix whose columns are the right singular vectors.
When we perform PCA, the right singular vectors (the columns of V) correspond to principal components. By choosing the first k singular values in Σ and the corresponding columns in V, we reduce the dimension to k while preserving as much variance as possible. Each principal component is a direction in feature space that explains a maximal amount of the total variance.
Practical Steps and Real-World Application
In practice, we might preprocess data by standardizing each feature (subtract mean, divide by standard deviation) so that all features contribute equally. Then we apply PCA to find the principal components and select the top k that account for, say, 95% of the variance. This transforms the original dataset into a new dataset with k features. We can do this in Python as follows:
import numpy as np
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
# Suppose X is our n x d data matrix
pca = PCA(n_components=2)
X_reduced = pca.fit_transform(X)
print("Reduced shape:", X_reduced.shape)
This transformed data can then be fed into downstream tasks such as classification, clustering, or regression. We often see improvements in training speed and sometimes more robust generalization if the original data had many correlated or noisy features.
Benefits and Potential Pitfalls
Dimensionality reduction can mitigate overfitting, reduce computation, and produce insightful visualizations of high-dimensional data. However, there are pitfalls:
It can lead to a loss of interpretability, since transformed components may not have a direct meaning like the original features.
If we reduce dimensions too aggressively, we might lose critical information, which can degrade downstream performance.
Non-linear methods such as t-SNE are excellent for visualization but might not be well-suited for general predictive tasks if we cannot easily invert the transformation or preserve distances for new data points in a straightforward way.
Follow-up Questions
How do we decide the number of components to retain during dimensionality reduction?
One approach is to look at the explained variance ratio. In PCA, we typically plot the cumulative explained variance against the number of components. We then choose k such that the cumulative explained variance surpasses a desired threshold (for example, 90% or 95%). Another practical consideration is computational or real-time constraints. In some scenarios, domain expertise or interpretability requirements might also drive the choice of k if we need the reduced dimensions to map back to meaningful factors.
Could we use dimensionality reduction for tasks beyond simply feature compression?
Yes. Dimensionality reduction can also help in data visualization (especially with methods like t-SNE and UMAP), noise filtering, and extracting latent factors in unsupervised settings. For example, in recommender systems, matrix factorization is a kind of dimensionality reduction that identifies latent user-item factors. The technique is also used for speeding up training in large-scale scenarios by projecting data to a smaller subspace.
Are there situations where linear dimensionality reduction techniques might fail?
Linear techniques, such as PCA or LDA, assume that data primarily lies along linear subspaces. When data is embedded on a more complex manifold, linear methods might miss crucial curved structures or clusters. In such cases, non-linear techniques like t-SNE, UMAP, or kernel PCA can capture more intricate relationships between data points. However, these methods can be more complex, computationally expensive, and require careful hyperparameter tuning.
What if we need interpretability after dimensionality reduction?
There are times when the new features (principal components, for instance) might not have explicit real-world meaning. To mitigate this:
We can examine the principal components by checking which original features contribute most to each principal component.
In some domains, methods like Sparse PCA or factor rotation techniques can yield more interpretable components by forcing many component loadings to zero or near-zero, making them more aligned with specific subsets of original features.
Alternatively, we can adopt domain-specific dimensionality reduction methods that try to preserve interpretability by using subject matter knowledge to group or transform features.
Is there a risk of overfitting or underfitting with dimensionality reduction?
Underfitting can happen if we reduce dimensions excessively and discard relevant features. Overfitting is usually less of a concern in the context of unsupervised dimensionality reduction, but if you combine dimensionality reduction in a pipeline with subsequent supervised learning, you must be careful to do cross-validation properly. For instance, the PCA transformation must be fit only on the training data to avoid data leakage into the test or validation sets.
How do we handle out-of-sample data after performing dimensionality reduction?
Once a dimensionality reduction algorithm like PCA is fit, it learns the transformation from the original feature space to the lower-dimensional space. New data can be transformed by applying the same learned projection. For methods like PCA, it is straightforward to project new data onto the principal components. For highly non-linear methods like t-SNE, it might be challenging to embed new points without refitting the entire transformation, which can be computationally expensive.
How does dimensionality reduction interact with regularization methods?
Regularization and dimensionality reduction can often be complementary. For instance, when dealing with high-dimensional data, you might use L2 or L1 regularization in a supervised model to avoid overfitting. Additionally, you could apply a dimensionality reduction technique like PCA or autoencoders to further reduce noise. In some sense, regularization penalizes large or complex models, while dimensionality reduction transforms the feature space, so combining the two can lead to even more robust solutions.
Dimensionality reduction remains one of the core concepts in ML pipelines, especially when facing high-dimensional problems with potential redundancy and noise in the features. It helps in both interpretative analysis (visualizations) and improving or speeding up downstream machine learning tasks.