ML Interview Q Series: How would you analyze why 1M Netflix users became inactive and what actions would you take?
📚 Browse the full ML Interview series here.
Comprehensive Explanation
Understanding why a large cohort of users has become inactive typically involves a multifaceted approach encompassing data analysis, user feedback, and strategic interventions. In practice, we want to investigate possible causes such as content preferences, user experience issues, pricing concerns, or shifts in user behavior driven by new competitor offerings. To detail it further:
Exploratory Data Analysis: A logical initial step is to analyze their past usage patterns before they went inactive. We can compare these inactive users against active groups to see if certain content preferences, demographic factors, or engagement metrics stand out. Understanding time spent per session, types of content last watched, frequency of usage, and historical membership duration can give strong signals regarding why they dropped off.
User Feedback and Surveys: Surveys or brief feedback forms, often sent via email or app notifications (for those who still allow push notifications), can surface direct reasons for inactivity. Users might indicate issues like “not enough local-language content” or “price too high compared to competitors.”
Competitive Analysis: Another angle is to analyze public forums, social media chatter, or competitor announcements. This might reveal that another platform has begun offering exclusive content that was once on Netflix, prompting users to switch.
Personalized Targeting: Segmenting these inactive users based on demographic or behavioral similarities can help tailor outreach. For instance, those who primarily watched kids’ content may have changed preferences as children grow, or those who exclusively watched specific genres might not have found new releases appealing.
Predictive Modeling for Churn Analysis: A data-driven approach to identify potential drop-off points can involve supervised learning techniques such as logistic regression, random forests, or gradient boosting models. Here, each user is represented by features reflecting historical usage, account details, and external data. The goal is to estimate the probability that a user will remain inactive or churn entirely.
Below is an example of a common logistic regression model for churn probability. Though churn is typically measured at a certain point in time, the structure remains informative:
Where P(Churn) is the predicted probability that a user will not return (remain inactive) or officially cancel, beta_0 is the intercept term, beta_j are the model coefficients learned from training data, and x_j are the feature values representing user attributes (such as days since last login, average watch time, preferred genres, subscription plan, or pricing tier).
This formula essentially computes the likelihood that a user has churned given the linear combination of their feature values.
After diagnosing reasons for inactivity, we can proceed with targeted strategies:
Incentives and Promotions: If data suggests users left due to pricing or competition, offering discounted rates for a limited time or bundled services might encourage them to return.
Content Personalization: If content mismatch is a factor, a deeper personalization approach, highlighting new or highly relevant shows/movies in their communication, can re-engage them.
Product Enhancements: If churn was driven by a poor user experience (technical issues, complicated UI, or missing platform capabilities), updates to the product can be highlighted to dormant users, letting them know the service has improved.
Awareness Campaigns: Sometimes people are simply unaware of new content or platform improvements. Regular newsletters, targeted social media outreach, or personalized emails can remind them of fresh offerings.
Account Reactivation Friction Reduction: Simplify reactivation steps (one-click reactivation, easy password resets, transparent billing statements) so users can seamlessly return.
Data-Driven Filtering: Some inactive users might have intentionally moved on and will not be persuaded by marketing or content changes. In those cases, it might be more cost-effective to mark them as truly lost or to downrank them in re-engagement campaigns, focusing budgets on users with a higher propensity to return.
Possible Follow-up Questions
How would you handle potential data imbalances where the majority of subscribers are still active?
One common scenario is that you have many more active users than inactive ones. In such cases, the labeled dataset for churn predictions can be imbalanced, making it harder for a model to learn the minority class. Approaches include:
Using specialized metrics (Precision, Recall, F1-score, or ROC-AUC) that appropriately capture model performance for imbalanced data.
Applying techniques like oversampling of inactive users or undersampling of active users to balance classes more effectively.
Experimenting with synthetic data generation (SMOTE) for the smaller class of inactive users.
How would you interpret the logistic regression coefficients for churn?
In logistic regression, each coefficient beta_j represents how strongly that feature influences the log-odds of churn (inactivity). For instance, a positive coefficient suggests that as the feature’s value grows, the chance of churn also increases. Interpreting these coefficients involves checking how an incremental change in each feature (like one additional day since the last login) affects the likelihood of a user staying inactive.
Could you elaborate on using user segmentation for targeted re-engagement?
User segmentation might leverage factors like viewing history, demographic details, device usage, or region. A typical approach is to cluster users into groups that share relevant behavioral traits. For instance, one segment might be older users who favor classic movies, while another segment might be binge watchers of certain TV series. Each segment might respond better to different re-engagement strategies. Binge watchers might be attracted back with exclusive previews or extended free trials for new seasons, whereas classic movie fans might prefer curated recommendations of lesser-known timeless films.
What kind of product changes could reduce future inactivity?
Product changes could involve:
Enhancing the recommendation system to highlight fresh titles aligned with past viewing habits or user ratings.
Optimizing loading speeds and application reliability, because performance issues can drive users away.
Improving the search and discovery experience so users quickly find relevant or newly released content.
Expanding content libraries into new genres or languages to match evolving user tastes.
Integrating social features or watch-party modes to make the platform more engaging.
If users remain inactive despite outreach, should we remove them from our database?
Platforms commonly adopt a data retention policy to manage costs and comply with regulations (like GDPR in Europe). Often, they archive or anonymize long-term inactive accounts to protect user privacy and reduce data overhead. However, complete removal is typically done carefully to avoid prematurely discarding potential reactivations. Some companies keep minimal user details (like email addresses) to facilitate a simpler reactivation process. It largely depends on legal requirements, platform strategy, and cost-benefit analysis of storing user data versus the likelihood of them returning.
Is there a potential use for a survival analysis approach?
Yes. Rather than a point-in-time prediction for churn, survival analysis (e.g., Kaplan-Meier estimates or Cox proportional hazards) models the time until a user becomes inactive (or churns). This approach is beneficial because it focuses on “when” churn is likely to happen and can update estimates as new user activities occur. It can uncover how certain events (like finishing a popular series) accelerate inactivity or how a discount extends user lifetimes.
How would you measure the impact of your re-engagement strategy?
An A/B testing framework can be employed to measure whether targeted re-engagement campaigns are significantly increasing the retention rate. One group of inactive users receives a particular intervention (like a personalized email with recommended shows and a discount), and another group is a control with no intervention. Comparing outcomes, such as how many ultimately return, the duration of renewed engagement, and subscription upgrades, helps validate the efficacy of the campaign.
How might you adjust your approach if these inactive users are in geographically dispersed regions?
In different regions, causes for inactivity can vary significantly. Some may face payment issues in local currencies or bandwidth constraints. Others might have a limited selection of relevant local-language titles. The next steps might include:
Localized content offerings and region-specific recommendations. Flexible, region-appropriate pricing or payment methods. Localized marketing campaigns or special promotions that resonate culturally.
Such localization often requires robust data collection and analysis to identify region-specific trends in churn, user feedback, or user-interface frictions.
What if most inactive users have switched to a competitor with exclusive content?
If the root cause is exclusive, high-demand content that Netflix does not offer, the platform might consider negotiating licensing deals or co-production ventures with content creators, or pivot to original productions in a similar genre or style. Marketing that highlights upcoming titles or exclusive Netflix originals can help draw back some users who left for competitor exclusives. However, platform differentiation often requires time and significant investment.
Overall, diagnosing the reasons for inactivity and deciding how to address it requires a careful blend of data-driven insights, product strategy, marketing tactics, and user-centric design improvements. By systematically analyzing user data, testing interventions, and considering personalized strategies, you stand a better chance of bringing inactive subscribers back or learning how to prevent similar drop-offs in the future.
Below are additional follow-up questions
How would you separate the impact of seasonal factors from genuine user churn?
Seasonal patterns can dramatically affect user engagement. For instance, some users might be more active during holiday periods due to time off work or special holiday-themed content, and less active at other times. To distinguish between genuine churn and seasonal inactivity:
One approach is to compare the same time window year-over-year. If you detect a recurring dip in usage for a specific period, it suggests a seasonal effect rather than an overall downward trend.
A time-series forecasting model (for example, SARIMA or Prophet) can decompose seasonality and trend in user activity. This model can help isolate stable, cyclical patterns from anomalies. Any unusual drop below the expected seasonal baseline might represent genuine churn.
It is essential to understand that simple cross-sectional analysis can overestimate churn during known low-engagement intervals. If a user typically pauses their subscription or usage every summer, a well-structured time-series analysis might confirm that pattern is normal for them, rather than a permanent departure.
A pitfall here is to treat all users uniformly. Some demographic groups are more affected by seasonal changes than others (e.g., students on break vs. working professionals). A targeted analysis of sub-segments may uncover hidden seasonal nuances.
How would you handle users who remain subscribed but have significantly reduced their engagement?
In some cases, a user maintains an active subscription (still paying) but barely watches any content. This silent disengagement can be a precursor to eventual churn:
Defining partial inactivity is key. For instance, you might create a threshold (like fewer than x hours per month or no recent completes of any show) that flags at-risk accounts.
Identifying these users early enables proactive re-engagement. Sending personalized recommendations or incentives might motivate them to explore new releases.
Investigating which part of the user journey changed is important. If they used to watch heavily on mobile devices but abruptly stopped, it might indicate new accessibility problems or a competing platform on that device.
A pitfall is to over-incentivize users who are already willing to keep paying. This can lead to unnecessary revenue loss (e.g., offering a discount to a user who had no intention of canceling). Hence, advanced modeling should account for the probability of churn to ensure that discounts or campaigns are well-targeted.
How would you approach users who have active subscriptions but share passwords instead of using their own accounts?
Password sharing can skew metrics of inactivity. An “inactive” user may still be using Netflix through someone else’s profile. This complicates churn analysis because:
The system might see minimal activity on the primary account but no clear drop in subscription payments, making it hard to classify them as a churn risk.
The content usage data might appear erratic. For instance, recommended titles might not align well with the original subscriber’s true interests, because someone else is influencing watch history.
Insights could include analyzing simultaneous logins, IP address distributions, or device patterns to detect possible sharing. However, there are privacy and user-experience constraints. Overly strict policies on password sharing might alienate genuine family members or cause negative PR.
On the flip side, if a platform’s terms of service permit a certain level of sharing, the platform could encourage these “inactive” paying users to create multiple profiles within the same plan. This could prompt more engagement from the paying account holder.
How do you handle churn drivers that are external to the platform itself, like an economic downturn?
External macroeconomic factors, such as recessions or spikes in living costs, can influence subscription cancellations or inactivity:
Monitoring macroeconomic indicators (unemployment rates, consumer confidence indexes, or inflation trends) helps contextualize overall drops in discretionary spending. A large-scale downturn might lead many users to cut back on entertainment services, even if they like the platform.
Collecting user feedback specifically referencing cost sensitivity can help differentiate dissatisfaction with content versus broader financial constraints. Tailored strategies, such as flexible payment plans or temporary price reductions for certain segments, might be considered.
A risk is that attempts to mitigate churn by permanently lowering prices can erode revenue and brand value. Instead, limited-time promotions or more budget-friendly tiers (with restricted content quality or limited simultaneous streams) are potential alternatives.
What if your machine learning model predicts high churn risk for premium-tier subscribers, but these users claim they are satisfied?
Contradictions between data-driven churn predictions and user-reported satisfaction are not uncommon:
User satisfaction surveys can be subjective and prone to bias. Some users say they are satisfied due to social desirability or incomplete self-awareness of potential cancellation intentions.
Churn prediction models rely on behavioral signals (reduced watch time, skipping certain content categories) that might indicate an emerging disengagement not consciously recognized yet by the user.
It is valuable to investigate which features in the model are driving these predictions. Possibly, premium-tier subscribers have certain usage patterns that resemble churners. Adjust the model or enrich it with additional context if you suspect a mismatch.
A pitfall arises if you dismiss the model solely because of self-reported satisfaction. Conversely, ignoring direct user feedback can also erode trust. Striking a balance by updating features or carrying out deeper analysis is essential.
How would you measure the long-term effectiveness of re-engagement tactics after the initial return?
Short-term metrics (like the number of users who log back in after a reactivation email) can look promising, but the true test is whether they continue to stay active:
Tracking post-reactivation usage patterns for weeks or months helps determine if they genuinely re-engage or just log in once then drop off again.
Implementing a holdout group in the re-engagement campaign is essential. Users who do not receive the campaign can serve as a baseline to compare long-term retention curves.
A risk is focusing on vanity metrics like immediate login spikes without examining sustained watch time, recurring subscription renewals, or user satisfaction. A short-lived improvement might mask deeper issues that cause subsequent churn.
How do you address privacy and legal constraints when analyzing or contacting these inactive users?
Handling potentially sensitive user data, especially for those who have stopped engaging, must meet local and international regulations:
Certain jurisdictions require explicit consent for re-engagement emails or promotional messages. The platform must comply with spam regulations (like CAN-SPAM in the U.S.) or GDPR-like laws in other regions.
Minimizing the data you retain about fully dormant users can reduce privacy risks. Anonymizing or aggregating data after a certain period might be mandated by law or beneficial to reduce exposure.
A subtle issue is inadvertently sharing user preferences or watch history in reactivation campaigns. Highlighting content that might reveal personal taste (e.g., niche medical documentaries) could breach user trust.
How would you tackle brand perception issues that might drive inactivity?
Sometimes large-scale inactivity signals deeper brand perception problems. If the brand is perceived as outdated, too expensive, or overshadowed by a competitor:
Conduct brand sentiment analysis across social media or community forums. Explore text mining for mention frequency and associated sentiment. If negativity is rising, inactivity is likely a symptom rather than a standalone problem.
Refreshing the brand image might involve marketing campaigns, collaborations with influencers, or high-profile exclusive content releases. However, brand transformations require time and consistency to shift user perception and bring them back.
A pitfall is launching superficial brand campaigns without addressing core user grievances like repetitive content libraries or streaming reliability. Users might return briefly out of curiosity but leave again if the underlying issues remain.
How do you evaluate the opportunity cost of re-engaging users who exhibit low average revenue per user (ARPU)?
Not all inactive users carry the same lifetime value. Some may be on discounted plans with minimal add-on purchases or historically low engagement:
One strategy is to rank users by predicted future value or ARPU. This ensures that higher-value segments receive a larger share of the re-engagement budget, such as personalized content recommendations or exclusive previews.
Automation can handle lower-value accounts with generic re-engagement emails to keep costs in check.
The trade-off is potentially ignoring segments that might have moderate ARPU but a high potential for upselling if approached correctly. Overly focusing on immediate revenue metrics can cause lost opportunities for growth in other market segments.
How would you incorporate user social networks or friend circles into an inactivity analysis?
Users often form clusters—friends and family may join or leave a platform around the same time:
Graph-based analytics can identify “churn clusters,” where one key influencer’s departure prompts others to become inactive. This is especially relevant in contexts where people watch together or share show recommendations.
Interventions might involve re-engaging the influencer user first. If the influencer becomes active again, their network is more likely to follow.
A pitfall is overestimating network effects if your platform lacks social features. Not all churn is social-based. Additionally, implementing social-graph analysis might raise privacy concerns if done without transparent user consent.
How do you ensure unbiased testing of re-engagement strategies when certain inactive users rarely check their email or phone notifications?
Some fraction of inactive users will not receive or open re-engagement messages, leading to potential biases in evaluating marketing campaigns:
It helps to diversify channels—email, push notifications, in-app messages, or even direct mail in some markets—to maximize reach.
Separate the unreachable users in your analysis. Consider them a unique segment, then track any changes in their activity over time (they might return spontaneously or through word-of-mouth).
A critical pitfall is concluding a campaign is ineffective because “unreached” users do not respond. Without isolating that group, the overall average reactivation rate might appear smaller than it truly is among those who actually saw the message.
How would you escalate intervention efforts if initial re-engagement attempts fail?
A tiered approach can be established:
First-tier nudges are mild reminders highlighting new content or relevant shows.
If there is no response, second-tier interventions could involve time-limited promotions, special offers, or account simplifications (e.g., “Resume your plan with one click—no added costs for three months”).
If attempts continue to fail, consider a final courtesy message indicating account downgrade or partial archiving of user data.
A subtle issue is that repeated messages can frustrate users who truly wish to remain inactive. Over-communication might harm brand perception. Balancing the frequency, tone, and aggressiveness of campaigns is crucial.
What if the root cause is a user interface overhaul that confused or alienated certain user segments?
Major interface changes or feature redesigns sometimes result in user frustration:
Identify usage drop patterns correlated with the release date of the new interface. If a large share of inactivity began shortly after the update, conduct user surveys or usability tests to confirm UI issues.
Rapidly addressing the main points of confusion or offering a tutorial for the new interface can mitigate further churn. Consider rolling back certain changes if the data shows they produce significant negative user reactions.
A common pitfall is attributing the inactivity solely to product changes without considering concurrent external factors. A major competitor’s launch might coincide with your UI revamp, blending multiple causes.
How do you handle VIP users (e.g., early adopters or brand ambassadors) who suddenly turn inactive?
VIP or long-term subscribers who have been highly engaged and enthusiastic might have a large sphere of influence:
A direct personal touch, like an email or phone call from a dedicated support representative, can show commitment and glean precise reasons for their disengagement.
Such users are often more willing to share detailed feedback about feature improvements or policy changes that could bring them back.
However, this one-on-one outreach can be expensive and might not scale to the entire inactive population. Implementing it for the highest-value or highest-influence users is a practical middle ground.
When a VIP user churns, it can send negative signals to their network. Monitoring and responding swiftly is critical to prevent a broader exodus.
How do you adapt re-engagement approaches over time as user behavior and market conditions evolve?
User tastes, technological trends, and competitor offerings shift rapidly. A re-engagement strategy that worked last year might fail now:
Continuously monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) such as open rates on emails, user return rates after campaigns, and time spent on platform. A significant drop in these metrics might indicate that new tactics are needed.
Regularly update your churn prediction models with recent data. User preferences can change (e.g., a shift from binge-watching to shorter, on-the-go viewing).
A pitfall is employing a static segmentation or rules-based approach for years, ignoring changes in content consumption habits, emerging competition, or new devices. Regular model recalibration and campaign experimentation keep the platform’s efforts aligned with current realities.