ML Interview Q Series: What kinds of cluster structures do different clustering algorithms usually aim to identify?
📚 Browse the full ML Interview series here.
Comprehensive Explanation
Clustering refers to the task of grouping data points in such a way that points within the same group (cluster) have similar characteristics, while points belonging to different groups differ significantly. Different types of clustering algorithms are distinguished by the structural assumptions they make about how clusters are formed. Below are some common clustering structures and how they relate to popular algorithms.
Partition-Based Structures
Partition-based clustering divides the dataset into a specified number of clusters, typically denoted as K. A well-known example is the K-Means algorithm, where each cluster is represented by its centroid. The algorithm tries to minimize the sum of squared distances between data points and their respective centroids.
Here, J is the K-Means objective function. K is the total number of clusters. x_i is the i-th data point, C_k is the set of data points belonging to cluster k, and mu_k is the centroid of cluster k. The algorithm iteratively updates centroids and data-point assignments until convergence, aiming to produce compact clusters centered around these centroid points.
This structure assumes relatively spherical or compact clusters. Partition-based methods often struggle with more complex structures such as arbitrary shapes or varying cluster densities.
Hierarchical Structures
Hierarchical clustering approaches build a hierarchy (a tree-like structure called a dendrogram) of clusters. Two major forms are:
Agglomerative clustering, which starts with each data point as its own cluster and successively merges clusters.
Divisive clustering, which starts with all points in one cluster and recursively splits clusters.
This approach does not require specifying the number of clusters in advance. Instead, one can examine the dendrogram and “cut” it at a desired level to get a particular number of clusters. This hierarchical structure is useful when the data naturally exhibits multi-level groupings.
Density-Based Structures
Density-based clustering algorithms, such as DBSCAN or HDBSCAN, consider clusters as regions of high density separated by regions of low density. Instead of trying to optimize a global objective like K-Means, these approaches look for neighborhoods that have a minimum number of points in a given radius. Data points that do not belong to any high-density region are considered outliers.
This allows for discovering clusters of irregular shapes and handling outliers effectively. However, choosing proper density parameters, such as epsilon (the radius of neighborhood) and minPts (the minimum number of points required to form a dense region), can be challenging in high-dimensional or noisy data.
Distribution-Based Structures
Distribution-based clustering relies on the assumption that data is drawn from a mixture of probabilistic distributions. A common example is the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). Each cluster is assumed to be generated by a component distribution (often Gaussian), and the goal is to estimate the parameters of these underlying distributions.
This approach can model soft clustering, where each point has a probability of belonging to each cluster. It also captures clusters that may vary in their covariance structure (i.e., elliptical shapes). However, fitting distribution-based models can be sensitive to initialization, local optima, and the correct choice of distribution family.
Graph-Based Structures
Graph-based clustering, such as Spectral Clustering, constructs a similarity graph where each node represents a data point, and edges encode pairwise similarities. The algorithm uses properties of the graph’s Laplacian matrix to partition the data into clusters.
In this structure, clusters can be seen as connected subgraphs that capture strong internal similarities. Spectral Clustering leverages linear algebra on the graph Laplacian to identify these connected components or “communities.”
Subspace or Projected Structures
High-dimensional data often makes clustering difficult due to the “curse of dimensionality.” Subspace clustering approaches recognize that clusters might only be meaningful in certain subsets of dimensions rather than the entire feature space. These algorithms identify both the clusters and the specific dimensions (subspaces) in which the clusters hold their structure.
While powerful for high-dimensional data, subspace clustering can be computationally expensive and requires careful handling of parameter choices.
Practical Considerations
Different cluster shapes, densities, noise levels, or data distributions can drastically affect which algorithm performs best. In practice, one might experiment with various methods and evaluate them qualitatively (e.g., by visualizing the results in reduced dimensions) or quantitatively (using cluster validation indices).
How do Partition-Based Methods Handle Outliers?
K-Means and other partition-based approaches generally do not handle outliers well. An outlier can greatly influence the position of a centroid. Sometimes robust variants of K-Means (e.g., K-Medians, K-Medoids) help mitigate this by focusing on medians or actual data points rather than means.
How do You Choose the Number of Clusters for Methods like K-Means or Gaussian Mixture Models?
Selecting the optimal K often involves heuristic methods such as the Elbow Method (examining how within-cluster variance decreases with increasing K), the Silhouette Score (which measures cluster cohesion and separation), or information criteria (like AIC or BIC in Gaussian Mixture Models). There is no universal rule, and domain knowledge often guides the decision.
Why Would Someone Prefer Hierarchical Clustering Over Partition-Based Clustering?
Hierarchical clustering can reveal nested, multi-level structures in the data. It also allows you to decide on the number of clusters after the model is built by inspecting the dendrogram. In contrast, partition-based methods require you to fix the number of clusters at the start. However, hierarchical methods can be computationally expensive for very large datasets.
How is DBSCAN Different from K-Means in Handling Noisy Data and Cluster Shapes?
DBSCAN classifies points as core points, border points, or noise based on local density. This design naturally excludes outliers (noise points) from cluster assignments. Furthermore, DBSCAN can discover arbitrarily shaped clusters, as opposed to K-Means, which generally only captures spherical clusters around centroids. However, DBSCAN requires setting epsilon and minPts, which can be hard to choose in high-dimensional spaces.
Can We Combine Clustering Structures?
Yes, hybrid approaches do exist. For example, you might start with a density-based approach to eliminate outliers or to find coarse clusters, then refine those clusters using a partition-based method. The particular structure you aim for may depend on domain-specific insights or computational constraints.
When Would Distribution-Based Clustering (e.g., Gaussian Mixtures) be Preferred Over Others?
Distribution-based models are often chosen when you believe the data arises from a mixture of probability distributions, particularly Gaussian. They allow for soft assignments (i.e., partial membership) and can handle clusters of varying shapes determined by covariance matrices. This is especially useful in applications like speech recognition or image processing where data might naturally follow such probabilistic patterns.
Could You Provide a Simple Code Example for K-Means and DBSCAN?
from sklearn.cluster import KMeans, DBSCAN
from sklearn.datasets import make_blobs
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Generate synthetic data
X, _ = make_blobs(n_samples=300, centers=3, random_state=42)
# K-Means
kmeans = KMeans(n_clusters=3, random_state=42)
labels_km = kmeans.fit_predict(X)
# DBSCAN
dbscan = DBSCAN(eps=1.0, min_samples=5)
labels_db = dbscan.fit_predict(X)
# Plotting results
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(10, 4))
ax1.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=labels_km)
ax1.set_title("K-Means Clustering")
ax2.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=labels_db)
ax2.set_title("DBSCAN Clustering")
plt.show()
In this example, K-Means produces exactly three clusters, as specified by n_clusters=3, whereas DBSCAN discovers clusters based on local densities. Any points considered outliers by DBSCAN are typically assigned a label of -1, indicating noise or outliers.
Clustering methods can differ greatly in how they form clusters, the shapes they can handle, their sensitivity to outliers, and how many parameters you must tune. Understanding these structural differences will guide your choice of algorithm for a specific domain or data characteristic.