ML Interview Q Series: What steps are essential when preparing your dataset prior to employing k-Means clustering?

📚 Browse the full ML Interview series here.

Comprehensive Explanation

k-Means clustering partitions data points into k distinct clusters. It typically relies on minimizing the within-cluster variance, often measured by the sum of squared distances between each sample and its assigned centroid. One of the most central expressions of the k-Means objective is:

Here, C_j is the j-th cluster, x denotes a data point belonging to that cluster, and mu_j is the centroid of the j-th cluster. k-Means converges by iteratively updating cluster assignments based on distance to each centroid, then recalculating the centroids.

Preprocessing the data for k-Means is crucial because the algorithm is heavily influenced by scale, outliers, and the representation of features. The main goal is to ensure that distance calculations are meaningful and that no single feature dominates the distance metric.

Handling Missing Values

In real-world scenarios, you often encounter missing entries. There are different strategies to address this: Imputation Techniques: You can fill in missing values with statistical measures (like mean or median). Although, for skewed distributions, median can be more robust than mean. Deletion: If the data is large and missing values are sparse, dropping incomplete records might be acceptable. But this can lead to data loss, so it should be done cautiously.

Scaling and Normalization

k-Means typically uses Euclidean distance. If one feature is much larger in magnitude than others, it will disproportionately influence the distance. Therefore, normalization or standardization is recommended: Standardization: Transform each feature so that it has mean 0 and standard deviation 1. This is done by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation for each feature. Min-Max Scaling: Rescales each feature to a fixed range (often 0 to 1). This can be appropriate if the data is in a known bounded interval or if you want to preserve certain ratios.

Dealing With Outliers

Outliers can mislead the centroid calculation because Euclidean distance heavily penalizes points that are far from the centroid: Outlier Removal or Winsorization: You can cap extreme values at certain percentiles. Robust Scaling: Using transformations like the interquartile range (IQR) to minimize outlier effects on clustering.

Encoding Categorical Features

k-Means uses distance measures best suited for numerical data. If you have categorical features, you could convert them using techniques like one-hot encoding. However, this can inflate dimensionality and potentially skew distance calculations if many categories exist. Sometimes it might be more appropriate to choose a different clustering method (like k-Modes) specialized for categorical data.

Dimensionality Reduction

High-dimensional data can cause issues such as the curse of dimensionality, leading to distance measures becoming less meaningful: Principal Component Analysis (PCA): By projecting data onto principal components, you can reduce dimensionality while retaining most of the variance. t-SNE or UMAP: These are typically more for visualization and exploratory analysis; for standard clustering pipelines, PCA is often more common.

Practical Example in Python

import pandas as pd
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.cluster import KMeans

# Load your data
data = pd.DataFrame({
    'feature1': [1.0, 2.1, 3.5, 2.8, 9.0],
    'feature2': [100, 150, 180, 130, 900],
    'feature3': [5.5, 3.2, 6.1, 2.0, 0.3]
})

# Handle missing values, e.g. drop or fill them
data.fillna(data.mean(), inplace=True)

# Scale the data
scaler = StandardScaler()
scaled_data = scaler.fit_transform(data)

# Apply K-Means
kmeans = KMeans(n_clusters=2, random_state=42)
kmeans.fit(scaled_data)

# Predictions
labels = kmeans.labels_
print(labels)

The code snippet demonstrates a typical pipeline: filling missing data (if any), standardizing features, and then applying k-Means.

Common Follow-Up Questions

How do you decide whether to standardize or use min-max scaling before k-Means?

In practice, you often standardize features if you anticipate outliers or if your features are in widely different ranges but share a somewhat normal distribution. Min-max scaling is used if your data is in a bounded range (for example, pixel intensity values between 0 and 255) or if you want to preserve the relationships of the absolute values. Standardization compresses outliers, while min-max scaling retains them more strongly in the 0 to 1 range. If outliers are extreme, they might influence k-Means more under min-max scaling.

What if some features are more important than others?

If certain features are more critical, you can weight them. One approach is to scale each feature by its respective weight, effectively emphasizing or de-emphasizing that feature’s contribution to the distance calculation. Alternatively, domain knowledge might suggest selecting or engineering features that truly capture meaningful aspects of the problem.

Is it ever reasonable to remove outliers before clustering?

Yes. Outliers, especially in smaller datasets, can disproportionately affect centroids because k-Means is highly sensitive to points that are far from the main cluster mass. You can remove outliers if you have domain-based justification that they are anomalies or noise. However, be cautious, because some outliers might be valid points, and removing them could bias the clustering result.

How do you handle categorical variables if k-Means is required?

k-Means is based on Euclidean distance, which is not ideal for categorical variables. One-hot encoding is a naive approach that can inflate dimensionality. Alternatives like k-Modes or k-Prototypes exist specifically for categorical data. If you insist on using k-Means, you can transform nominal attributes into numeric vectors with caution, but interpret results carefully because distance in high-dimensional one-hot spaces can be misleading.

When would dimensionality reduction be beneficial, and how many components should be retained?

Dimensionality reduction is beneficial when high-dimensional feature spaces lead to diluted distance metrics (often referred to as the “curse of dimensionality”). PCA is a common approach to project the data into a lower-dimensional subspace while preserving most variance. You typically select the number of components by examining the cumulative variance explained. A good rule of thumb is to keep enough components to explain 90% to 95% of the variance, though domain context might shift this threshold.

Are there cases where scaling is unnecessary?

If all your features are already on a similar scale and you’re sure no single feature’s magnitude will dominate the clustering, scaling might not be strictly necessary. However, in most real-world cases, features have varying ranges, and scaling is recommended to avoid skewing your distance calculations.

Should I remove correlated features before clustering?

Highly correlated features can cause redundancy, and they might bias the clustering because the same underlying signal is counted multiple times. You could remove or combine these correlated features, or use PCA to reduce dimensions. Redundant features often do not improve cluster quality and may add unnecessary complexity.

Could I use non-Euclidean distances with k-Means?

Classic k-Means is tightly coupled with Euclidean distance. The centroid update step mathematically relies on the Euclidean norm to minimize the sum of squared distances. If you want to use other distances (Manhattan, cosine similarity, etc.), you might consider alternative algorithms like k-Medoids or hierarchical clustering. These methods are more flexible with the distance metric at the cost of potentially higher computational complexity.

How do I determine the appropriate number of clusters after preprocessing?

Common approaches include: Elbow Method: Plot the within-cluster sum of squares against different k values and look for an “elbow” where improvements level off. Silhouette Score: Measures how similar data points are within a cluster compared to other clusters. A higher silhouette score indicates better-defined clusters. Domain Knowledge: Sometimes domain context or a known number of natural groupings informs you of the ideal k.

All these steps, combined with rigorous experimentation, ensure that you’re pre-processing your data properly and applying k-Means in a robust and meaningful way.