This survey bridges the gap between scattered MLLM benchmarks and organized evaluation methods
Organizes and analyzes evaluation benchmarks for Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs)
-----
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15296
🔍 Methods used in this Paper:
→ The paper presents a hierarchical taxonomy of MLLM evaluation benchmarks across foundation capabilities, model behavior, and extended applications.
→ It outlines benchmark construction methods, including data collection and QA pair annotation processes.
→ The survey introduces three evaluation approaches: human-based, LLM-based, and script-based assessment.
→ It provides insights into future benchmark directions, focusing on capability taxonomy and task-oriented evaluation.
-----
💡 Key Insights:
→ MLLMs struggle with fine-grained perception tasks and visual mathematics
→ Open-source models are increasingly matching closed-source performance
→ Complex localization and structural relationships remain challenging
→ High-resolution data significantly improves object recognition and text understanding
Share this post