Prompt Decorators: A Structured Approach for Stronger AI Responses

Users often need clear, organized answers from AI models. Poorly crafted prompts lead to vague or unfocused responses. Prompt Decorators add structured directives to prompts, guiding AI toward more reliable, well-structured outputs. Below is a compact overview of how they work, why they matter, and how to use them. All instances of "+++" have been replaced with ">>>" in this explanation.

The Problem with Unstructured Prompts ⚠️

• Users often see inconsistent or rambling answers.

• Fine-tuning prompts can be a guesswork exercise.

Prompt Decorators solve this by providing precise instructions that models follow consistently.

What Prompt Decorators Look Like ⚙️

They are simple instructions at the start of a prompt. Each decorator modifies how the AI responds. Inspired by Python decorators, they act like prefixes that shape outputs.

Below is a quick Python analogy to show how decorators modify a function’s behavior.

def log_decorator(func):
    def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
        print("Before running:", func.__name__)
        result = func(*args, **kwargs)
        print("After running:", func.__name__)
        return result
    return wrapper

@log_decorator
def sample_function(x):
    print("Operation on:", x)

sample_function(5)

This code adds logging statements before and after the decorated function. The decorator log_decorator wraps sample_function, showing where the function starts and ends. This helps with debugging, monitoring, or diagnostics in larger projects where tracking function execution is useful.

---

Now in this article, for Prompt Decorators, I will use ">>>"

Why ">>>" instead of "@": Because mostly "@" is used for tagging. ">>>" is an easy-to-spot alternative for AI directives. But of-course you can use whatever, you feel comfortable with. The purpose here is just to let the LLM explicitly know this particular symbol means a very specific thing. And then you MUST have to define this decorators somewhere.

3. Example Usage ⚡

• Without a decorator:

Suggest a name for an AI product.

• The output might be a short list of names.

• With a >>>Reasoning decorator:

>>>Reasoning Suggest a name for an AI product.

• The AI first explains its thought process, then lists names.

This enforces structured reasoning before the final answer.

Core Decorators and Definitions 🚀

Below are common decorators. Each one imposes a specific format or method of reasoning.

A "Prompt Decorator" is an instruction added to a prompt to modify the output or guide how the response is generated.

---

Keep these definitions in any system prompt or context where you want them to work.

LLMs will treat symbols like “>>>“ as plain text unless they have been explicitly defined. Prompt Decorators are structured instructions, not magic commands. They only work as intended when introduced and explained in the system prompt or relevant context. Without that, the model interprets them as ordinary text, which might explain certain unexpected results.

>>>Reasoning
Whenever this decorator is present in a prompt, the system must open with a well-structured explanation of the thinking and rationale behind its answer. This explanation must directly address the question at hand.

>>>StepByStep
Whenever this decorator is used, the system must organize its response into a clearly labeled series of steps, for example: [Step 1] → [Step 2] → ... → [Final Step]. This sequence must be followed whenever the decorator appears.

>>>Socratic
Whenever this decorator is present, the system must use a Socratic approach by posing clarifying questions before providing any direct solution. The structure should be: [Restate Question] → [Clarify Definitions] → [Analyze Assumptions] → [Explore Perspectives] → [Use Analogies/Examples] → [Encourage Further Inquiry].

>>>Debate
Whenever this decorator is applied, the system must outline multiple perspectives before concluding. The response format should be: [State Position] → [Perspective 1] → [Perspective 2] → ... → [Analysis & Rebuttal] → [Conclusion]. A balanced exploration of contrasting views is required.

>>>Critique
Whenever this decorator is included, the system must provide a balanced evaluation by identifying strengths and weaknesses, then offering suggestions for improvement. The required sequence is: [Identify Subject] → [Highlight Strengths] → [Critique Weaknesses] → [Suggest Improvements] → [Constructive Conclusion].

>>>Refine(iterations=N)
Whenever this decorator is present, the system must produce multiple iterative enhancements, with N defining how many iterations occur. The response must follow: [Iteration 1] → [Iteration 2] → ... → [Final Answer]. Each round should refine clarity or accuracy.

All these directives must be observed whenever their respective decorators are part of a prompt.

---

Real-World Applications 🌐

Marketing & Content Use >>>Refine(iterations=N) to polish a slogan over several versions.

Development & Automation Use >>>OutputFormat(format=JSON) to get structured data for direct integration into code.

Business & Policy Use >>>Debate to see different perspectives on decisions like remote work or new product strategies.

Research & Academia Use >>>CiteSources for references and verifying claims with evidence.

Implementation Details 🏗️

Define these decorators in a System Prompt or store them via personalization features if your LLM supports it. For example:

>>>Reasoning
Whenever this decorator is present in a prompt, generate a step-by-step explanation before finalizing the answer.

Then, in your actual prompt:

>>>Reasoning What is a good tagline for an AI writing tool?

The LLM will respond with a structured reasoning phase, then a final answer.

Some may script these definitions automatically, ensuring every prompt carries them in contexts where structured outputs are needed.

Wrap-Up ✅

Structured directives make AI more reliable and organized. Prompt Decorators offer:

• Clear, logical frameworks for responses

• Multiple refinement steps for polished content

• Balanced viewpoints for complex decisions

• Explicit fact-checking and citations for credibility

They reduce trial-and-error and produce outputs that match user needs.

But noting again, that LLMs do not automatically interpret something like “>>>“ unless it is explicitly defined. So you must have to deine them separately. If you try them without defining them, in the system prompt or context, the model will view them as normal text, which can lead to unexpected behavior.