0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

"Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts: Framework for Superior Reasoning and Knowledge Propagation in Large Language Models"

Generated below podcast on this paper with Google's Illuminate.

A new way to make LLMs reason better: divide problems, score thoughts, and learn from mistakes

RDoLT (Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts) introduces a three-tier decomposition system for LLMs that breaks down complex reasoning into manageable steps while tracking both successful and rejected thoughts for better decision-making.

-----

https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02026

🤔 Original Problem:

LLMs struggle with complex reasoning tasks, often making mistakes in mathematical problem-solving and logical thinking. Current methods like Chain-of-Thought and Least-to-Most lack effective mechanisms to evaluate intermediate thoughts and handle errors.

-----

🔧 Solution in this Paper:

→ RDoLT decomposes reasoning tasks into easy, intermediate, and final tiers, allowing systematic progression through complexity levels

→ Each tier generates multiple thoughts that are evaluated using four criteria: Logical Validity, Coherence, Simplicity, and Adaptiveness

→ A Knowledge Propagation Module (KPM) tracks both selected and rejected thoughts, enabling dynamic re-evaluation throughout the reasoning process

→ The system uses a scoring mechanism to select the most promising thoughts at each stage while maintaining awareness of previously rejected ideas

-----

💡 Key Insights:

→ Breaking down complex reasoning into progressive difficulty levels reduces cognitive load

→ Tracking rejected thoughts prevents premature discarding of potentially valuable solutions

→ Systematic scoring of thoughts using multiple criteria leads to more reliable reasoning

→ Dynamic feedback loops between decomposition levels enable error correction

-----

📊 Results:

→ Achieved 90.98% accuracy on GSM8K benchmark with ChatGPT-4, surpassing previous methods by 6.28%

→ Demonstrated consistent improvements across multiple benchmarks with accuracy gains of 5.5-6.75%

→ Performed effectively across different model sizes and architectures