In-context learning is just fancy pattern matching that emerges naturally from language processing
This paper expands our understanding of in-context learning beyond few-shot supervised learning, showing how it emerges from basic language processing capabilities.
-----
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03782
🤔 Original Problem:
Research has focused narrowly on few-shot supervised in-context learning, missing the broader spectrum of how LLMs adapt to context through instructions, role-play, and other mechanisms.
-----
💡 Solution in this Paper:
→ The paper reframes in-context learning as any sequence task where context reduces prediction loss
→ It shows how in-context learning emerges naturally from language model training on sequential dependencies
→ The solution connects basic language capabilities like coreference resolution and parallel structure to more complex adaptation
→ This framework unifies different types of in-context learning under a single theoretical perspective
-----
🔑 Key Insights:
→ In-context learning exists on a spectrum from simple memory tasks to complex adaptation
→ Basic language processing capabilities form the foundation for more sophisticated in-context learning
→ Different types of in-context learning may share neural circuitry and mechanisms
→ Generalization should be evaluated across multiple dimensions: what is learned, how it's learned, and how it's applied
-----
📊 Results:
→ Early transformer models like GPT-1/2 showed improved coreference resolution, marking progress in basic in-context learning
→ LLMs demonstrate flexible generalization across domains, from integers to abstract concepts
→ Models can learn from various formats: examples, instructions, explanations, and role prompts
Share this post