This paper evaluates how LLMs can generate LSTM code for time series forecasting, helping data analysts automate deep learning model creation.
-----
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18731
Original Problem 🤔:
Data analysts need LSTM models for time series analysis but lack coding expertise. Manual implementation requires deep understanding of neural architectures, making it inaccessible for many practitioners.
-----
Solution in this Paper 🛠️:
→ Researchers tested GPT-3.5, PaLM, Llama-2, and Falcon on financial time series forecasting tasks.
→ They designed prompts with varying levels of clarity, objectives, context, and format.
→ Generated LSTM code was compared against manually optimized implementations.
→ Temperature and configuration parameters were systematically analyzed.
-----
Key Insights 💡:
→ Simple prompts often outperformed complex ones
→ Lower temperature settings (0.1) reduced hallucination compared to higher values (0.7)
→ One or two LSTM layers with 50 nodes proved optimal
→ Batch size of 32 showed best results across models
-----
Results 📊:
→ GPT-3.5 achieved lowest RMSE on 8/10 datasets
→ Generated models outperformed manual implementations on 7/10 datasets
→ Temperature of 0.1 reduced invalid model generation by 40%
Share this post