AI productivity myths, Grok’s model card, Boston Dynamics humanoid progress, Meta’s restructure, and Google’s numbers on the carbon cost of a single AI prompt.
That Boston Dynamics video was awesome. That was the first time I've seen a robot course correct like that
Thanks Stewart for the kind words. super happy to know.
Most debates on AI stay at the level of prompts and productivity.
But the real difference is not in prompts — it is in orientation.
AI is never “smart” or “stupid.”
It mirrors the epistemic stance you bring:
• Coherence before knowledge.
• Potentiality before performance.
• Becoming before answers.
This is the epistemic key to AI: using it not as a tool of automation, but as an infrastructure of becoming.
I have unfolded this here:
https://substack.com/profile/110168113-leon-tsvasman-epistemic-core/note/c-154706867
That Boston Dynamics video was awesome. That was the first time I've seen a robot course correct like that
Thanks Stewart for the kind words. super happy to know.
Most debates on AI stay at the level of prompts and productivity.
But the real difference is not in prompts — it is in orientation.
AI is never “smart” or “stupid.”
It mirrors the epistemic stance you bring:
• Coherence before knowledge.
• Potentiality before performance.
• Becoming before answers.
This is the epistemic key to AI: using it not as a tool of automation, but as an infrastructure of becoming.
I have unfolded this here:
https://substack.com/profile/110168113-leon-tsvasman-epistemic-core/note/c-154706867